What If Private Air Travel Meant The Wealthiest Had To Pay A Climate Tax? – CleanTechnica

---

Support CleanTechnica’s work through a Substack subscription or on Stripe.

---

Private jet owners and travelers bypass the hustle-and-bustle of major airports. They have the privilege of landing at secluded destinations with luxury concierge amenities, isolating themselves from the congestion, inconveniences, and scrutiny that everyday air travelers experience. If a new proposal becomes the norm, however, owners of private jets, the airports that house them, and private jet passengers may find themselves the object of even more exclusivity — one that’s making them bristle. That’s because a few countries around the world have started conversations about imposing climate tax fees on first- and business-class seats on private flights, called the Premium Flyers Solidarity Coalition Declaration.

And why not? Isn’t it time for the most carbon-intensive means of travel to pay its fair share? Airline fuel frequently is untaxed. The industry is not held responsible for its environmental impacts. There is a strong rationale for global carbon pricing in international aviation, as carbon pricing has so far been limited to carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions or fuels at the national level, but a climate tax can also be imposed on global sectors like international aviation — with immediate benefits.

Pricing these private jet emissions could help global climate policy in two ways, according to the IMF.

1. It could accelerate technological development while incentivizing efficiency, kick-starting the sectors’ transition to net zero while addressing the sectors’ to-date favorable tax treatment.
2. Pricing could raise up to $200 billion a year in revenues by 2035, which could be allocated to climate finance.

“Carbon pricing can provide the necessary price signal to cost-effectively promote development and deployment of low-carbon technologies while incentivizing increases in efficiency,” the IMF concludes.

Of course, as with all climate protection proposals these days, significant political barriers exist. Elite air travel constituents have rarefied perspectives on revenue allocation and managing price impacts, both of which arise primarily from flight tickets but less so for shipped goods. Pacifying these objections could result in pricing variants (aka “fee and rebate” schemes, or feebates), which would benefit carriers and their clients but produce fewer revenues.

It’s notable that, historically, increased prices in air travel have not curbed demand.

Aviation accounts for 2.5% of global CO₂ emissions and has contributed around 4% to global warming to date. Private jets and first-class seats standing out for a disproportionate share of pollution per passenger. CleanTechnica senior writer Steve Hanley reminds us that “the weaponized version of capitalism in vogue today assigns no value to the pollution that burning fossil fuels creates.” Aviation emissions are excluded from consideration under the terms of the Paris Climate Accords because, like emissions from the maritime industry, those emissions are spread all around the world and cannot be definitely assigned to any one nation.

In 2025, private jet travel soared in popularity. And it wasn’t just a luxury product — it has become a marker of status and class and marketed as a strategic travel choice for corporations, entrepreneurs, and high-net-worth individuals. Rising global flight activity, new subscription models, and evolving customer priorities have made business aviation more accessible and valuable than ever.

The Premium Flyers Solidarity Coalition Declaration

Spain and France are the two industrialized countries that are in favor of the Declaration that would impose a private jet climate tax. Other countries that have fewer private jets also want in: Benin, Djibouti, Kenya, Nigeria, Sierra Leone, Somalia, and South Sudan. Other countries are interested by viewing from the sidelines: Antigua, Barbuda, Brazil, Fiji, and Vanuatu. These small or less industrialized countries are interested because they have emitted fewer emissions, experience a majority of climate consequences, and would benefit greatly if the climate tax were made mandatory.

The US, the UAE, and Great Britain haven’t indicated interest, even though at this early stage the Declaration is voluntary.

Let’s zoom in on the UK. Around 100,000 private jet flights depart from UK airports each year, yet many pay no or minimal air passenger duty (APD), due to outdated thresholds and loopholes in the tax system. The climate charity Possible relates that a frequent flyer levy could be imposed, commensurate with the more flights they take in a year. Such an approach to taxing ultra-frequent fliers and private jet users would bring down aviation emissions while avoiding impacting ordinary working people, Possible concludes.

The International Air Transport Association (IATA) dismisses outright the Premium Flyers Solidarity Coalition Declaration, saying, while “the ambition to mobilize climate finance is commendable,” the means are flawed. The IATA argues that such levies don’t directly lead to emissions reductions while risking counterproductive effects for developing economies and small island states. “Increased taxation on air travel threatens connectivity, distorts competition, and ultimately undermines social and economic development in the regions most reliant on aviation as a lifeline,” they insists.

What about sustainable fuels, you ask? Aren’t they a viable compromise to a climate tax on luxury air travel? It is important to note that sustainable fuels – including liquid biofuels, biogases, low-emissions hydrogen, and hydrogen-based fuels – have the potential offer multiple benefits for the energy sector. The IEA anticipates that, by 2035, sustainable fuels would cover 10% of all global road transport demand, 15% of aviation demand and 35% of shipping fuel demand. National shares, mixes, and volumes, though, would still vary widely depending on regional conditions. Sustainable fuels are a tool in the climate action toolkit, but hitting where it hurts financially makes the most emissions reduction impacts.

The European Commission has set out a plan to reduce its emissions by 90% by 2040 compared to 1990. All sectors, including aviation, will need to address their emissions contributions. Of course, some private jets passengers have already opted for transfers at hubs near EU borders, such as Istanbul, Doha and Dubai, to avoid paying the cost of complying with EU climate measures on the full route.

In 2023, the CEO of Qatar Airways called any aviation industry’s emissions goals little more than a “PR exercise.”

Yet without mitigation actions, emissions from international transport fuels are set to expand rapidly with growth in the global economy. Carbon taxes promote a full range of mitigation responses — if a healthy price point accompanies the implementation. A climate tax would apply charges to the carbon content of fuel use, based on jet fuel use times their respective emissions factors. With a fixed climate tax rate, the quantity of emissions would be left to be determined by market forces such as demand for air travel and the costs of mitigation technologies.

Final Thoughts

As we discuss the ultra wealthy and their hold on climate action, it’s important to note that climate change media coverage declined overall between 2022 and 2025.

Robert Reich reminded us recently of the importance of independent media.

“Trump’s blatant threats against corporate media whose journalists ask him hard questions and whose comedians ridicule him — and media executives’ chickenshit, obsequious responses to those threats — are exposing the dangers of giant media corporations controlling our access to the truth.”

If you are reading this, please become a subscriber to CleanTechnica and help us to tell the stories that are important to hear as we unveil a decentralized and really marvelous vision of a clean energy and healthy climate future.

Resources

• “Delivering Sustainable Fuels.” IEA. 2025.
• “Destination net zero: The urgent need for a global carbon tax on aviation and shipping.” IMF. October 2024.
• “Explained: The carbon budget delivery plan.” Possible. November 2024.
• “Statement on Premium Flyers Solidarity Coalition Declaration.” International Air Transport Association. November 2025.
• “There’s a new effort on the runway to raise climate funds.” New York Times. November 2025.
• “What share of global CO₂ emissions come from aviation?” Our World in Data. April 2024.