From Sawmill To Module: How Canada Can Scale A Low-Carbon Timber Value Chain – CleanTechnica

---

Support CleanTechnica’s work through a Substack subscription or on Stripe.

---

Canada’s opportunity in mass timber is not just about building more mills or adding capacity here and there. It is about creating an integrated value chain that runs from forests to finished housing modules. That means linking sawmills, energy systems, adhesives, logistics, and modular factories into a coherent industrial strategy. The Transition Accelerator’s roadmap points to a Canadian market worth about $1.2 billion by 2030 and roughly $2.4 billion by 2035, capturing up to a quarter of global share. Meeting those targets requires more than raw material. It requires a system.

This is the third in a series on the opportunity that Canada has at the intersection of forestry, cross-laminated timber, economic growth, housing and climate action. The first piece introduced the opportunity for Canada to take a dominant position in cross-laminated timber manufacturing, while the second dealt with the key enabler of Mark Carney’s focus on housing and CLT to deal with Canada’s housing crisis.

The choke points are already visible. Feedstock is the first. Mass timber products like CLT and glulam need lumber of specific dimensions and moisture content. Mills are optimized for standard framing lumber, not lamstock for engineered wood. That mismatch means mass timber producers often face shortages or pay premiums, and their production can be throttled by inconsistent supply.

The second choke point is energy for drying. Lumber has to be dried from green to about 12 percent moisture before it can be bonded into panels. Kilns are energy intensive and in many cases still burn natural gas or diesel. That raises costs and drives embodied emissions.

Adhesives are another weak link. The resins used to bond CLT layers are almost all petrochemical based. They perform well but carry a carbon footprint and pose health concerns. Research groups in Canada and abroad are advancing lignin-based and other bioadhesives, but scaling them into production is still ahead of us.

Logistics is the final bottleneck. CLT panels and modular units are bulky and heavy. Trucking is the main mode of transport, and it is costly and carbon intensive. Long hauls from distant mills or factories add both emissions and dollars per square meter of housing delivered.

An industrial strategy needs to address these choke points directly. Colocating sawmills, CLT lines, glulam plants, and bioenergy facilities in regional hubs is one way. The sawmill produces the lumber, residues feed a bioenergy unit, and the heat and electricity from that unit power the kilns and presses. The CLT and glulam plants convert the lumber into panels and beams. A modular factory nearby turns those panels into modules. Long-term lamstock contracts between sawmills and mass timber producers stabilize supply and avoid the feast or famine cycle that has plagued the industry.

Electrifying transport is part of the same vision. Short haul log transport can move to battery electric trucks, while longer distances should shift to rail, ideally electrified over time. Regional hubs reduce the need for hauling across provinces, cutting both cost and carbon.

The playbook requires concrete actions. Biomass and hybrid electric kilns are one. Every sawmill generates bark, sawdust, and offcuts. Those residues can fuel high efficiency boilers or be fed into biomass gasifiers to provide process heat and electricity. Heat pump based kilns are another option, using renewable electricity to pull moisture from wood with far greater efficiency than conventional dryers. The switch cuts emissions and insulates mills from fossil fuel price swings.

Logistics has to change as well. Canada has abundant rail infrastructure that could be better leveraged for moving panels and modules over distance. For shorter routes, battery electric log trucks have already been tested in British Columbia with promising results.

Adhesives are the most difficult but also one of the most promising levers. Moving lignin-based resins from pilot scale into full production will take public and private investment, but once commercial, these adhesives turn a fossil input into another renewable loop in the forestry system. Canada’s chemical industry is capable of supporting that transition if demand is there.

The economics of integration are compelling. A breakdown of lifecycle emissions shows that harvesting and transport account for a significant portion of embodied carbon, drying dominates mill stage emissions, and adhesives are the largest non energy contributor in panel assembly. Tackling each of those reduces the emissions stack per cubic meter of CLT.

Cost stacks tell a similar story. Transport adds dollars per square meter of floor area when panels travel hundreds of kilometers. Energy spikes project budgets when gas prices rise. Adhesives are one of the single largest line items in panel production. Cutting costs at these choke points makes mass timber more competitive with concrete and steel.

Logistics maps illustrate why regional hubs matter. Panels and modules can be trucked economically within about 400 kilometers. Beyond that, costs escalate. Clustering sawmills, CLT lines, and factories around major demand centers like Toronto, Vancouver, and Montreal makes sense for both cost and climate reasons.

There are risks. Lumber prices are volatile, and mills may hesitate to commit to long term lamstock contracts without strong demand signals. Bioadhesives may take longer to reach market readiness than expected. Provinces may move at different speeds in adopting building code updates, creating a patchwork regulatory environment. Workforce shortages could emerge as factories scale faster than training programs produce skilled workers. At the same time, the enablers are strong. The federal roadmap financing is in place. Low-carbon procurement policies are beginning to favor wood. Indigenous partnerships in forestry and modular manufacturing are gaining momentum. Global demand for low carbon construction materials is climbing steadily.

The conclusion is that Canada cannot win by simply adding more sawmills or CLT presses. Success will come from building an integrated system where forests feed sawmills, sawmills feed energy plants and CLT lines, and those feed modular factories that deliver housing. That system reduces costs, stabilizes supply, and slashes emissions. It also builds resilience into the sector, making it less vulnerable to fossil fuel volatility or global shipping disruptions.

The opportunity is a triple win for housing supply, economic development, and climate performance. Canada has the resources, the policy framework, and the market pull to execute this playbook. The question is whether we will treat mass timber as an industrial strategy from sawmill to module, or let it remain a niche material in a fragmented sector.