Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!
New research conducted by the online driver education resource Zutobi, The 2024 EV Charging Station Report: State-by-State Breakdown, has produced some interesting insights about American electric vehicle infrastructure. It’s timely given the recent election results, because with a new administration and a lack of clarity about the future of US electric vehicles, it might be reassuring to consider the following new information about what is happening at the state level. Lucas Waldenback, Zutobi’s co-founder, answered some questions about the report for CleanTechnica.
North Dakota has less than 1,200 electric vehicles, yet it has 21.8 chargers per 100 EVs. How is North Dakota doing reasonably well with EV charger installation, but not with EV adoption?
North Dakota has approached EV infrastructure in a forward-thinking way, ensuring that the groundwork is laid before a major surge in adoption. The state’s low population density and large rural areas make range anxiety a valid concern for residents, which can impact adoption rates. But by developing its charging network early, North Dakota is removing a key barrier to EV ownership, setting itself up to handle future adoption more effectively as consumer interest grows and vehicle prices continue to become more competitive.
Is the situation similar in Wyoming to North Dakota, or are there factors in Wyoming that are different?
Yes, the situation is quite similar in Wyoming. Like North Dakota, Wyoming has a low EV adoption rate but leads the country in chargers per 100 EVs. Both states share a rural landscape and vast open spaces, making it critical to have sufficient infrastructure to support drivers. Wyoming’s proactive investment in chargers helps to reassure residents that EVs are a viable option, even in rural areas. Wyoming also benefits from strategic planning around highways and interstates, ensuring longer trips are feasible with EVs.
In California and Florida there are some EV charging deserts. What can be done about them?
Addressing charging deserts in states like California and Florida will require both public and private sector collaboration. Expansion of charging networks in suburban and rural areas could be incentivized through government grants and private investments. Additionally, fast-charging hubs at key locations — such as along highways, shopping centers, and public spaces — can help alleviate pressure in underserved regions. States can also collaborate with local utility companies to offer favorable rates and incentives for both businesses and residents to install chargers.
Oklahoma and Arkansas recently experienced EV registration surges. What caused them?
The EV registration surges in Oklahoma and Arkansas can be attributed to a combination of factors. First, rising fuel prices have pushed consumers to consider alternatives, and electric vehicles offer substantial savings over time. Additionally, new models from automakers are offering greater range at more accessible price points, making EVs an attractive choice. Federal incentives and state-level programs are also helping residents offset initial costs, and as infrastructure improves, people are more confident that EVs can meet their daily driving needs.
Why do New Jersey and Illinois, two states with reasonable EV adoption, lag in EV charger installation?
New Jersey and Illinois are experiencing rapid EV adoption, but their infrastructure has struggled to keep up with the demand. Both states have high population densities, which can complicate the logistics of installing public chargers in urban settings where space and access are limited. Furthermore, the pace of infrastructure installation has not matched the consumer demand, creating gaps. To address this, both states may need to accelerate public-private partnerships and offer incentives for businesses and communities to install more chargers, especially in high-density areas.
Are some consumers beginning to understand that EVs are a good value and have benefits gas vehicles do not?
Absolutely. We’re seeing more consumers recognize the long-term savings that EVs offer, from lower fuel costs to reduced maintenance expenses. Additionally, EVs have unique advantages, such as quieter operation, instant torque, and, for many, the benefit of lower environmental impact. With greater access to information and more affordable options entering the market, more drivers are viewing EVs as a smart, practical choice that aligns with their financial and environmental values.
Do you expect the recent US Presidential Election outcome to impact federal EV incentives for consumers?
With the recent election outcome, there is a lot of speculation around what might happen to federal incentives for electric vehicles and infrastructure. President-elect Trump has indicated plans to potentially roll back unspent funds from the Inflation Reduction Act, which includes key EV incentives like consumer tax credits and support for battery production. If this happens, it could raise the cost of EVs for consumers and potentially slow sales.
Trump’s stance on the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (NEVI) program could also impact the installation of charging infrastructure, particularly in areas currently underserved. This could present challenges for the broader auto industry as it pivots to EVs, though larger players like Tesla may benefit from their scale and established networks. Furthermore, a shift in emissions standards could affect the competitiveness of American automakers globally.
We’re expecting to see a series of regulatory debates and possible adjustments in the months ahead. While the specifics are still unfolding, state-level support for EVs and infrastructure will be crucial in maintaining momentum and continuing the progress we’ve seen in recent years.
Do you think federal EV charger funding will be eliminated?
It’s unlikely that federal funding for EV charging infrastructure will be completely eliminated. With a strong national focus on reducing emissions and promoting energy independence, EV infrastructure remains a bipartisan priority. Federal support is crucial to bridging infrastructure gaps, especially in underserved rural and urban areas. While we may see adjustments to funding allocations, the widespread need for accessible charging infrastructure makes it likely that funding will continue, albeit potentially with some shifts in focus.
Will both blue and red states need to offer their own EV incentives to consumers and fund their own charging infrastructure?
Yes, individual states will need to take an active role in supporting EV adoption through their own incentives and infrastructure funding. While federal incentives provide a baseline, local needs vary significantly, and state-level support will be essential to ensure adequate infrastructure and affordability for residents. Whether blue or red, states are recognizing that supporting EVs brings economic benefits and helps attract investments in new technologies, making local incentives and funding increasingly common.
Read the full report here: The 2024 EV Charging Station Report: State-by-State Breakdown
Chip in a few dollars a month to help support independent cleantech coverage that helps to accelerate the cleantech revolution!
Have a tip for CleanTechnica? Want to advertise? Want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.
Sign up for our daily newsletter for 15 new cleantech stories a day. Or sign up for our weekly one if daily is too frequent.
CleanTechnica uses affiliate links. See our policy here.
CleanTechnica’s Comment Policy
